![]() ![]() This is plain greed and can't be explained by anything else than being greedy. (The 8GB model was sold, alongside the 3rd-gen 32/64GB ones, up until Oct/2010.) Think of a customer: he purchases the 2G in Sept/2010 only to find out his device has become completely useless two years after. (Before that, the deployment target had been 4.0, making any new apps incompatible with 1st-gen devices.) Particualrly annoying and anti-consumer is the fact that Apple rendered the iPod touch 2G incompatible with any updated / new app only two years after ceasing selling it. Still, Apple has pulled the plug from even 2nd-gen devices (iPhone 3G, iPod touch 2G) last September by raising the minimal deployment target to 4.3. Models that can't be easily developed for (iPhone 2G/3G, iPod touch 1G/2G) could run a lot of non-CPU/GPU-intensive apps like Web browsers etc. As I said before it sounds mean to people who don't have the means to grab new one (but again if you have an iPhone 2,3,3GS then you either had money back then because Apple is expensive, or you just bought a second hand device that happens to be years old instead of getting something like an inexpensive Android model), but if we played the nice guys and go Gandhi on everything evolution of technology wouldn't take place and we would be still on keypad phones or typewriters. So in the end yeah, it might seem as Apple is the bad guy in this case, but in reality, old hardware is just old hardware. More scenarios could be painted with the word "trouble" right there in bold. Then of course you'd say you wouldn't do that and so on so forth, but trust me, there are a lot of folks out there that would.Īnd that's just off the top of my head right now. ![]() What do you do? File a complain to the developer, about it having a bug, and then would you expect the developer to check 3 year old code (now in version 2.0 and iOS 6)? Do you expect to rate 2-stars on a 3-year old version?Īs a developer, the sole idea of having a bug report of something more than 3 years old is just. Now, you upgrade to your "latest" or "maximum" available version per platform (1.5). 1.5 works with iOS 4, then 1.6 and ahead broke compatibility and only works with iOS 5. Imagine if what you had was say, version 1.4 of an app (let's say you paid for it but never cared to upgrade). ![]() But to be honest, if I owned Apple, I wouldn't support 3 year old devices either!!! Is it mean? Maybe if you don't have the funds. Now, we can get to nitpick biz by saying "it's just an older version of an app" but in reality hardware stops being supported, and so does software. My best tip is to use VLC instead of the Airfoil Video Player – in the menubar when VLC is open select Window –> select Track Synchronization and set Soundtrack-synchronization to -2 sec for correct synchronized playbackīonus tip: Airfoil is not compatible with 10.Click to expand.Yes, it's called the tech business and not only Apple does, most companies do. The Web Video function also has a strange bug scrolling on a webpage causes the speakers (you are streaming to) to make static crackles. The build-in Web Video function's playback manage to use all my Mac's resources, yet the playback is not smooth and the player often crashes. After a couple of minutes your Mac's fans are running at max trying to prevent another Chernobyl meltdown. As soon as you start watching any video the CPU usage is going to spike. The issue with the Airfoil Video Player is extreme CPU usage. However, if you intend to watch a video, the functionality of the build-in Airfoil Video Player is disappointing. Trust me, they get a lot of business these days.Īirfoil is excellent for streaming any audio to any Airport device (for Airport Express and Apple TV, I know for sure). And for $470 less than I would have had to pay otherwise.ĭeveloper: I shall be certain to mention your program to my audiologist. (There are some other apps or software that claim to do some of what AirFoil does, but they were nowhere near as user friendly.) Indeed, AirFoil lets me link from my laptop directly to my iPhone, and from there, it bluetooth connects directly to my hearing aids. I already had a license for AudioHijack, so I trusted this manufacturer. Instead, they want to sell me a $500 device that will run from the laptop headphone port to their device, and then the aids bluetooth to that device.Īs I was doing a ton of research on how to avoid that $500 expense, I ran across a mention of AirFoil. But there's no application interface by the hearing aid manufacturer that will let me do this. They're able to bluetooth directly to my iPhone, which is nice, but I wanted to connect them directly to my MB Pro. My situation is a bit different but probably worth mentioning.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |